| Just Answers |
Hubs | Hubbers | Topics | Request |
| #1 in Business | Subscribe Email Print |
|
You are here: Home > Writing and Speaking > Writing > Politically Correct Affects Creative Writing - Too |
|
Just Answers - Politically Correct Affects Creative Writing - Too
This Politically Correct stuff is just going too far. I never did like the concept of anyone being treated with kid gloves just because they were...whatever. That seems to me to only accentu According to USFDA, a combination product is one composed of any combination of a drug and device; biological product and device; drug and biological product ate the differences that are trying to be eliminated, and awfully condescending. Most people don’t need laws or rules or oaths to be decent human beings. I am going to narrow this whole PC fi ; or drug, device, and biological product and fixed dose combination would include two or more combinations of drug. Examples of combination products may in sco down to the subject of critiquing. In the olden days before Politically Correct was born, writers understood the difference between constructive criticism and a negative, personal flame. Th lude drug-coated devices, drugs packaged with delivery devices in medical kits, and drugs and devices packaged separately but intended to be used together. ey knew what they were going to get when they asked for a critique, and used what they could to improve their work. Or they ignored it. It certainly was not a crime for a reviewer to point ou here is enormous increase in the number of combination products entering the market in the recent years. Combination products have proven advantages but fixe an area that wasn't working for them. In today’s world if you give a critique, there will be more than one person protesting the reviewer, and reminding them of the old adage, “If you can’t say d dose combinations are still in the process of convincing regulatory authority on their advantages over the single ingredient formulations. Combination pro it nice, don’t say anything at all.” This charge is not always led by the writer. It’s often led by a PC observer who has not read the work and doesn’t intend to; nor cares if the criticism h ucts have become life saving products for the pharmaceutical companies who doesn’t have many innovative molecules in their product pipeline and have been inc t its mark and is valid. They are only concerned with the feelings of a writer, and it being posted on a public forum. If a writer intends to share his work by publishing it, even if it’s an on easingly used in the product life cycle management. Even the companies having product patents are trying to extend their product life cycle through the combi line writer’s group, they are opening up their work to constructive criticism. It doesn’t matter if it’s a writing to release their pent-up emotions or just for fun. If it's posted publicly, t nation products and maximize the revenues. But the companies involved in this practice are overlooking that they are burdening the patients both economically ey are publicly asking for opinions. What they do with those opinions is their business. But, no one has the right to insist that all feedback be praise. Nor do they have the right to restric and physically. They need to rightly judge the benefits of the combination products and they have to even look at the risks involved when combining the produ t the public comments to those that rave and praise. If they truly don't want critiques or low rates, all they have to do is post an author's note at the top of the page stating this. Tell the ts. Some of the combination products were well accepted by physicians while others suffered. Companies involved in development of combination products are fi eaders it's a personal piece and they aren't looking for reviews. They can still receive readers and stars. Readers should respect their requests and not critique the piece! Read, Comment and ding difficulty in defining their combination products and facing various challenges from selecting a combination to marketing it. Following aspects would a Rate is okay. Keeping constructive reviews private robs the members who view the public review page of the opportunity to learn and grow. It keeps those members who do want co dd to the challenges in developing combination products: Which markets to tap where the combination products can do fairly well? Which combination prod structive feedback from receiving it because... these PC advocators are very good at discouraging the reviewers who want to help. Imagine, a writing site where constructive revi cts are meaningful and rational? Which therapeutic categories to select? Which Combinations can address unmet needs of the patients? Do combin ews are not encouraged. Catering to a small group who complains of constructive feedback is done to the detriment of those who hope to publish someday. Anyone who writes merely to bask in tions increase the patient compliance? What would be the developing cost? How to tackle the risks encountered during combination product developmen he warmth of praise isn't interested in publishing in the same way. He is a dabbler. He doesn't want or need critiques. Some don't, and that's okay. But, they really should say so. They sho t? As combination products don't fit into the traditional categories of drugs, medical devices, or biological products, the USFDA is in the process of devel uld not set the standard for those who are ready and willing to work hard. A writer wants to tell the best story he’s capable of telling. He’s willing to put in the hard work, and he will at le ping new procedures for reviewing their safety, efficacy and quality. Professional from academic institutions, pharmaceutical industries, health care indust st try to accept ‘negative’ constructive feedback. He might cry and hit the wall, but he always comes back. He isn’t destroyed by one or two critiques. A real writer knows the difference betwe y and representatives from various regulatory agencies are working out to design the regulatory requirements for manufacture and sale of combination products en a personal flame and a constructive critique. If a writer has the nerve to post and share his work in a public forum, he has the nerve to receive criticism without falling apart. We should b . As there is an increasing trend of the combination products companies manufacturing such products should be able to tackle the problems involved in the de giving him the right tools to strengthen his writing, which will strengthen his confidence, instead of assuring him his work is already perfect and he doesn’t need to listen to those mean ol’ r elopment. They need to be wiser in analyzing the market trends and the regulatory requirements. Companies that provide selfless information through particip eviewers. By giving only Politically Correct reviews, we’re keeping them down where they will never learn and improve. That's not politically correct, in my opinion. Now tell me, is that nice tion in industry events and feedback to regulatory authorities would be able to face the challenges and will be successful in developing combination products
HTTP = HTML link (for blogs, profiles,phorums):
Related Articles:Don't Get Upside Down On Your Motorcycle Loan How I make Money With Link Exchanges
|